Remembering Eric Hoffer, working-class philosopher
By Howard Isaac Williams
.
I first met Howard Williams in early 1998 when he and a group of San Francisco bike messengers showed up at our International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) headquarters on 1188 Franklin Street. He and his comrades were members of the SF Bike Messengers Association and they wanted to join the ILWU. We told them that we would gladly affiliate the SFBMA and give them office space in our warehouse Local 6 on 9th street. But we all committed to working together to win bargaining rights for messengers – bikes, cars and walkers – in the Bay Area. Howard worked tirelessly with us to organize, and we were successfull in bringing two companies under contract: Pro Messenger and Ultra Ex. The collaboration between ILWU and the messengers also resulted in a “peace” agreement between Muni drivers of the TWU and the bikes which deescalated potential deadly clashes between the two groups. Many messengers think that the ILWU presence added a modicum of self respect and self worth that reduced rampant substance abuse in the bike community.
Howard remains an avid supporter of the ILWU and a striking figure on a bike with his distinctive head gear, beard and lanky physique. He is still a working messenger. He is also a thinker about many topics: politics, religion and philosophy. We are proud to run his essay on Eric Hoffer another ILWU member who had a lot to say about a lot of things. This article originally appeared in the June, 2019 issue of The Dispatcher, the newspaper of the ILWU.
.
This year marks the 60th anniversary of the writing of Working and Thinking on the Waterfront by Eric Hoffer (1898-1983), an author and active member of International Longshore & Warehouse Union Local 10 from 1943 until his retirement in 1964. Working and Thinking was the result of a journal Hoffer kept from June 1, 1958 to May 21, 1959. In his observations, Hoffer commented on a variety of personal matters and public issues, including the manner of social change. His statements that “Drastic change juvenilizes” and can even cause “dehumanization” may help explain Internet trolls, social media mobs and the polarization that now afflicts American politics and journalism. His 1958 claim that “If an American businessman had displayed a fraction of such megalomania [of foreign tyrants] he would have been made the laughingstock of the world” leaps off the page when we consider that such a businessman now occupies the White House.
Unfortunately, Hoffer’s insights into social change are limited to analysis of change in general. Nowhere in Working and Thinking does he mention the approaching containerization that would soon haunt the futures of longshore workers.
Hoffer was a working-class philosopher. Among ourselves, working people have always discussed issues of the day or of eternity with perspectives and insights unfamiliar to many professional scholars. Our wisdom rarely breaks out of our ranks. In addition to having limited time to write or otherwise express our experiential wisdom, we face prejudices from publishers and other cultural gatekeepers who often stereotype us. Hoffer was one exception who managed to break into the wider culture with The True Believer, his 1951 study of fanaticism. This book launched Hoffer on a successful career as an author. He wrote nine more books along with magazine articles and a syndicated newspaper column. Yet unlike most successful working-class writers and artists he never quit his “day job.” Indeed, in Working and Thinking, he credited his longshore work as an assistance to his creativity. And he used the flexible schedule made possible by the hiring hall to gain chances to write that workers in other trades did not have.
His statements about working people stand as vigorous assertions about our deeds and dignity. To Hoffer, “Honor Labor” was more than a slogan. It was an integral part of his artistic expression and daily life. In these times, media portrayals of working people are relatively few and rarely done with awareness or solidarity. Most newspapers and magazines no longer even print once obligatory Labor Day articles about working people and our unions. In contrast to today’s neglect of workers (especially those who do physical labor), Hoffer’s words from the past are a timeless affirmation of the inherent dignity of labor and a repudiation of postmodern corporate so-called values. Hoffer believes that in general, “common people have a better opinion of mankind than do the educated” and expresses “confidence in the competence of the run-of-the-mill American” while crediting “the masses” with the building of America. Much of this confidence comes from his experience in union meetings. And on the waterfront, he experiences “a strong feeling of belonging.” Hoffer does not over romanticize workers, either as individual persons or as a class; he finds shortcomings including some among himself and his colleagues.
The waterfront and America have changed much since the late 1950s. Rather than looking back nostalgically or endorsing all change uncritically, we might read Hoffer for what we can regain in order to face opposition to our basic rights as workers and as people.
…
Mr Williams, I am trying to get hold of you to chat about bike messengers in SF. I’m writing a book and would like to interview you about the union drive of the 1990s.
Thanks to Peter Cole for his comments. His takes on Hoffer as a conservative in a militant progressive union also deserve reading. Even in a book as short as “Working and Thinking On the Waterfront,” Hoffer addressed a variety of political, social, artistic and philosophical issues, sometimes with views that are not easily categorized. Hoffer’s faults deserve mention in part so that we do not automatically accept his warnings. But many of those warnings deserve consideration especially when viewed in the context of today’s secular capitalist system.
Thanks to Stansbury Forum for publishing my commemorative review of Eric Hoffer’s “Working and Thinking On the Waterfront.” Earlier this year I asked the Stansbury Forum to publish my review and was told to wait because articles about COVID 19 had priority. I guessed that the review would be published after the election.
So I was mildly surprised to see the review published on August 24.
Printing it before the election makes a partisan point which I do not want to make. When the review was first published last year in The Dispatcher, the election was far away and the Democrats were assembling the largest and most diverse group of Presidential candidates in the history of any party in any nation at any time. Printing the review now may give some readers an impression that my blunt criticism of Donald Trump is my implied support for Joe Biden. This is not the case. Biden and Kamala Harris are members of that faction of the Democratic Party which has turned the party from being pro-peace to pro-war and pro-America to pro-corporate. Locally that faction has reigned over the soft ethnic cleansing of San Francisco, pushing out Blacks, Latinos, workers and children while presiding over a free fall in the quality of government services from de facto segregated schools to deforested streets to a public transit system inferior to those even in impoverished cities worldwide. Many people sincerely believe that this faction is the lesser of two evils and should be supported for that reason. I respect this opinion and will consider it between now and November 3. But having seen war, right now I can not in good conscience support either candidate of the major parties.
Thanks to Mr. Williams for his thoughtful essay on Eric Hoffer! I appreciate that Williams gave this book a serious read. I also like that Williams noted Hoffer had nothing to say about containers in 1958-9. Truly, Hoffer’s journal entries had very little to say about his work and literally nothing about the ILWU. Hoffer did–briefly–freak out over automation in the early 1960s only to reverse course and proclaim that automation would be great for American workers…boy was he wrong! I explored this pivotal issue, containerization, in several chapters of my book, Dockworker Power, and quoted Hoffer a number of times. (Peter Olney reviewed my book for Stansbury Forum…)
While I respect Hoffer was a deep thinker, his reactionary politics always were odd, to put it kindly, in Local 10. From the old-timers I interviewed, he never spoke at meetings and wasn’t particularly liked on the waterfront. Not because he was a publisher author–Local 10 produced numerous authors! More because of his right-wing politics. I wrote about the irony of Hoffer being a member AND beneficiary of the ILWU: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2014/09/the-rights-working-class-philosopher
solidarity!